Bheem Kumar Yadav @ Bhim Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21512 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2021 Thana- ROHTAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

BHEEM KUMAR YADAV @ BHIM KUMAR Son of Vijay Yadav Resident of Village - Jalalabad, P.S.- Rohtas, Distt.- Rohtas. 2.

SACHIN KUMAR YADAV Son of Ajay Yadav Resident of Village - Jalalabad, P.S.- Rohtas, Distt.- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-08-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC.

Allegedly, the petitioners along with others assaulted the informant by means of knife due to which he sustained injuries It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21512 of 2022(2) dt.24-08-2022 2/2 have been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is an an admitted land dispute between the parties. He further submits that the injuries are simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the injuries are simple in nature, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in Rohtas P.S. Case No.248 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T