Taikir Khan @ Taukir Khan @ Diwan Tauqeer Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22936 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2023 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Taikir Khan @ Taukir Khan @ Diwan Tauqeer Khan Son of Khurshid Khan Resident of Village- Biur, P.S.- Chainpur, Distt.- Kaimur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-04-2024 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.336 of 2023 instituted under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, on advice of co-accused Sukhu Kumar, account of the informant and others got opened at C.S.P. to get work at steel plant to be opened in Mohania and thereafter some transactions were made fraudulently using those accounts. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was present at C.S.P. when the said accounts were opened on his instruction.

4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22936 of 2024(2) dt.15-04-2024 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no allegation that the petitioner has contacted with the informant and others. The petitioner has neither given any instruction about opening of the account and salary nor he has any steel plant. The only allegation against the petitioner is that he was present at the C.S.P. Centre. There is no allegation of overtact against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. II, Bhabua in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.336 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T