← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6867/2015bail granted

Rudal Chandra Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-05-05Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6867 of 2015 (5) dt.05-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6867 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2763 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Rudal Chandra Yadav, S/o- Late Munshi Rai, resident of Bhupatipur, P.S. Ramkrishana Nagar, P.O. Dhelwa, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Smt. Kiran Devi, aged about 41 years old, W/o- Sri Mutur Sao, resident of village Nijampur, Post Singhara, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, District Patna. At present Jai Prakash Nagar, P.S. Jakanpur, district Patna .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the Opposite party No. 2 is not present.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2763(C) of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was an agreement for sale and purchase of land in which certain amounts have exchanged hands between the parties. It is further submitted that the petitioner has received a sum of Rs.51,000/- out of which Rs.31,000/- has been repaid to the complainant- opposite

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6867 of 2015 (5) dt.05-05-2016 party no. 2. It is further submitted that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is that he had also received Rs.5.00,000/- is wholly unfounded and the signature purported to have been made on the deed of agreement is not genuine.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also that the signature on the deed of agreement is the subject matter of verification by the court below, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is/are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2763(C) of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T