Chinta Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18337 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-540 Year-2018 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
CHINTA DEVI Wife of Sidheshwar Paswan @ Sidhesar Paswan Resident of Village - Harli Khurd, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, Distt - Gaya. At present resident of Village - Rajasan, P.S.- Biddupur, Distt - Vaishali. 2.
Sidheshwar Paswan @ Sidhesar Paswan Son of Late Sukar Paswan Resident of Village - Harli Khurd, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, Distt - Gaya. At present resident of Village - Rajasan, P.S.- Biddupur, Distt - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dhirendra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 540 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 498A, 494 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act The petitioner no. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is father-in-law of the victim girl.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18337 of 2019(2) dt.27-03-2019 2/2 weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No. 540 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) mkchy/- U T