Aditya Kumar @ Aditya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24688 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2024 Thana- THAKRAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Aditya Kumar @ Aditya S/o Shyam Sundar R/o Vill- Barwa, P.S.- Turkpatti, Distt- Kushi Nagar (Uttar Pradesh) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shiv Sager Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Thakaraha P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024, for allegedly having committed offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 324(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution story, while the son of the informant along with other persons was visiting a fair, all the named accused persons, including the petitioners were misbehaving with some girls. When the son of the informant and others objected to the said indecent act of the petitioner and others, all the accused persons assaulted the son of the informant and others by knife, causing injuries on their persons.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24688 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/3 that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that while the petitioner was visiting the village fair, the informant's son and his friends assaulted him and no such occurrence has taken place as alleged by the informant. The allegation levelled in the first information report are general and omnibus and no specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. He further submits that other co-accused person, namely, Raja Kumar Verma @ Raj Verma has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 78403 of 2025. The petitioner has got clean antecedent.
5. The learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having heard the rival submissions and after going through the record, it appears that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against all the accused persons, including the petitioner and one of the co-accused persons has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Considering the above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24688 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 3/3 surrender within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bagaha, District-West Champaran in connection with Thakaraha P.S. Case No. 78 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., with further condition:
(1) The learned Court concerned shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Ritesh Kumar, J) AjayMishra/- U T