Raushan Kumar @ Roshan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19425 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2025 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Raushan Kumar @ Roshan Kumar S/O Amal Yadav Resident of VillageChak Mahuli, Police Station- Rosera, District Samastipur. .. ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pratik For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 09-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per FIR, petitioner along with other accused persons are involved in committing loot within the jurisdiction of different police station. It is alleged that on search, one country made loaded pistol and one Vivo company mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be evident from perusal of the First Information Report itself that a raid was conducted in the house of one Rohit Kumar and the petitioner was arrested from the said house and from his possession one country made loaded pistol and a mobile phone was recovered. It is further submitted that there was no independent witness to the search and seizure as such mandatory

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19425 of 2026(3) dt.09-06-2026 2/2 provisions have been violated. The petitioner is in custody since 07.12.2025 and the charge-sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 425 of 2025, subject to the conditions that:

(I) One of the bailors would be the family member or relative.

(II) The petitioner would appear physically on each and every date in the learned court below and would cooperate in the conclusion of trial and if the petitioner does not appear on two consecutive dates without any substantial and satisfactory reason, the learned court below would be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T