Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19619/2025bail granted

Ram Sakal Mukhiya @ Goli Mukhia v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-09Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19619 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-415 Year-2024 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ram Sakal Mukhiya @ Goli Mukhia S/o- Late Ram Nandan Mukhia VillageKomhara KUmhara Bishanpur Ps- Dumra Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 415 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, one country made pistol has been recovered from the bag of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19619 of 2025(2) dt.09-04-2025 2/2 also submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of arms. The bag from which the alleged recovery has been made does not belong to the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2024 and has got two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 415 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T