Jitani Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21607 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2024 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Jitani Devi Wife of Ram Vilash Sahni Resident of Village - Sukki Ward No.9, P.S. - Khajauli, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Mr. Ravi Prakash, ADvocates For the State :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2025 Heard Mr. Sgagandeo Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 30.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352 of B.N.S.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that she has assaulted to the informant by means of garasa blow due to which he sustained grievous injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and she has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21607 of 2025(3) dt.07-07-2025 2/2 petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the from perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that she assaulted to the informant by means of garasa blow and it appears from the injury report of the informant that the petitioner has given repeated blow upon the informant and she has received injury and injury report of the injured person (informant) suggests that the injury is grievous in nature.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as nature of injury, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st, Madhubani.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T