Rasendra Sahu v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28970 of 2012 ====================================================== Rasendra Sahu S/O Late Raj Kumar Sahu Resident Of VillageKhusiyalpatti, P.S.- Khutauna, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Tajmul Mian, Son of Manir Mian.

3. Boudha Mian, Son of Gurki Mian.

4. Bikan Mian, Son of Ishque Mian.

5. Mustakin Mian, Son of Makmul Mian.

6. Suresh Yadav, Son of Kanik Lal Yadav.

7. Ghuyan Yadav, Son of Bilat Yadav.

8. Baleshwar Yadav, Son of Pulket Yadav.

9. Deodatta Sah, Son of Bauseo Sah.

10. Devendra Yadav, Son of Guran Yadav. All 2 to 10 are residents of Village- Khusiyal Pattia, P.S. Khutauna, District- Madhubani. .... .... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 30-03-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application.

It is submitted by counsel that "No Objection Certificate" was obtained from the client whereafter no fresh Vakalatnama appears to have been filed The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 30.05.2012 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Madhubani, by which he has refused to summon the opposite party nos. 2 to 10 under the provisions of 319 Cr. P.C., in S.T. No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28970 of 2012 (3) dt.30-03-2015 2 / 2 224 of 2009, corresponding to (Lockauha) Khutauna P.S. Case No. 134 of 2004.

Considering that Section 319 Cr. P.C. should be used sparingly and only after the Trial Court is fully satisfied that the accused persons are required to be summoned in the ends of justice, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application stands dismissed.

U.K./- (Anjana Prakash, J) U T