Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1090/2014dismissed

Jeetendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

2015-03-27Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1090 of 2014 ====================================================== Jeetendra Kumar Singh son of Late Samarjjet Kumar Singh, resident of village- Pipraura, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director Bihar Education Council, Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad

4. The Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad

5. The District Education Officer, Aurangabad

6. The District Programme Officer, Prarambhik Shiksha and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Bihar Shiksha Pariyojana, Aurangabad

7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block Madanpur, Auranagabad

8. The Station House Officer, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. V.K.Mishra, Advocate : Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocate : Mr. S. Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Satyapal Singh, A.C. to S.C.-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

This application has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the first information report in Madanpur P.S.Case No.189 of 2014 registered under section 409 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in an out and out a false case. He had been relieved from the centre in question prior to the date of

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1090 of 2014 (5) dt.27-03-2015 2/2 verification made by the inspecting team in which certain discrepancies were found.

Be that as it may, these are the things which are to be considered by the investigating agency in course of investigation as the allegations made in the FIR do disclose a cognizable offence. At this stage, the probative value of the defence case is not to be considered by this Court.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this application.

Leave is granted.

The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- U T