Rinku Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4951 of 2023 ====================================================== Rinku Kumari wife of Manoj Kumar, resident of Hilsa, P.S.- Hilsa, DistrictNalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Bihar Technical Service Commission, through its Chairman, 19 Harding Road, Patna.
5.
The Chairman, Bihar Technical Service Commission, 19 Harding Road, Patna-1 6.
The Secretary, Bihar Technical Service Commission, 19 Harding Road, Patna-1.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Niraj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kaushal Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.P.K. Verma (AAG-3) Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, ac to AAG-3 For the Commission : Mr. Nikesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-11-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ / writs, order / orders, direction / directions to the respondents authorities concerned to consider and permit the petitioner's candidature and eligibility for the post of Auxiliary Nurse Midwifery (A.N.M.), which has
Patna High Court CWJC No.4951 of 2023(2) dt.01-11-2023 2/2 wrongly been rejected despite filing of duly filled up application with all required certificates as per the vacancy including the work experience certificate as per the guideline of the vacancy concerned resulting into finally debarring the petitioner from participating in the counseling for the post concerned by wrongly placing her down in the merit list by giving "zero"
marks in column of experience."
2.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition, to which the learned counsel for the respondent-State has got no objection.
3.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U