← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42817/2016bail granted

Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-17Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42817 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2016 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Guddu Kumar, son of Late Yamuna Das, resident of Village- Amar Chhatauni, P.S.- Chhatauni, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Rashmi Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 457, 380, 382/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is contended that though the petitioner has allegedly been apprehended on spot but there is no recovery of any looted articles except a knife and mobile. It is urged that the petitioner is in custody since 18.04.2016.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 5th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No.152/2016,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42817 of 2016 (2) dt.17-10-2016 2/2 with a further condition that one of the bailors must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his/her relationship with him.

If the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. That apart, in view of the antecedent of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Motihari, East Champaran within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police concerned upon his appearance. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T