← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5327/2024disposed

Md. Kaifi Iqbal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-20Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5327 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Kaifi Iqbal son of Sami Ahmad, resident of Village- Shahpur Baghauni, P.S.-Tajpur, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Patna, Bihar.

2.

Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 3.

Regional Deputy Director, Education, Darbhanga. 4.

District Magistrate, Samastipur.

5.

District Education Officer, Samastipur.

6.

District Programme Officer, Establishment, Samastipur. 7.

Programme Officer-cum-Nodal Officer, Education Department, Samastipur. 8.

District Education Superintendent, Samastipur. 9.

Chandra Bhushan Karn, Peon Middle School, Tajpur, Samastipur, resident of Village- Rohua, P.O.- Rohua, P.S.- Waris Nagar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Pleader 14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-06-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(a). For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to take further actions with regard to illegal appointment/posting of peon, Middle School, Tajpur, Samastipur (Respondent no.9) based on report of Programme Officer cum Nodal Officer, Education Department, Samastipur (Respondent no.7) submitted to District Programme Officer Establishment, Samastipur

Patna High Court CWJC No.5327 of 2024(2) dt.20-06-2024 2/2 (Respondent no.6).

(b). For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to take proper and legal actions against Respondent no.9 if his appointment on the post of peon is found bad, wrong and illegal."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U