Minhaz Ansari @ Md. Minhazuddin v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20516 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-941 Year-2017 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Banka ====================================================== MINHAZ ANSARI @ MD. MINHAZUDDIN Son of Jainul Ansari Resident of Naubabandh, P.S.- Dhoraiya, District - Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
Neelam Khatoon Daughter of Salim Ansari Resident of Naubabandh, P.S.- Dhoraiya, District - Banka.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 941 of 2017 registered under Sections 323, 406, 498A, 379/34 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of S.D.J.M., Banka.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the case has been compromised between the parties.
Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that vide
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20516 of 2019(10) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 order dated 01.08.2019, this case was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for settlement of the dispute between the parties, but the same has not been settled, as detailed in Report of the Mediator at Flag-B. Further, it is submitted by learned counsel for the Opposite Party no. 2 that the case has not been compromised. The petitioner has filed false and fabricated documents with regard to the compromise. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) shailendra/- U T