Moti Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61955 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2016 Thana -SATHI DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Moti Mukhiya S/o Sri Ramdhari Mukhiya, R/o Vill.- Basantpur, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sathi P.S. Case No. 34 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is of recovery of 20 liters of illicit liquor from the house of the petitioner.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 01.06.2018. It is further submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61955 of 2018 (2) dt.11-10-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Sathi P. S. Case No. 34 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T