Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18764/2020bail granted

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18764 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2019 Thana- BASANHI District- Saharsa ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR aged about 23 years, Male, Son of Shivnandan Yadav, resident of Village-Pithahi, Police Station & District-Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dashrath Mehta, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-06-2020 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for offence punishable under Section 414 of the IPC and under Sections-25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged that one MAGZIN, 7 live cartridges and one Red color motor cycle were recovered from the petitioner's possession for which he did not produce any documents. It is submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 6.12.2019 and charge sheet has already

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18764 of 2020(2) dt.04-06-2020 2/2 been submitted.

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-III, Saharsa in Basnahi Police Station Case No. 128 of 2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail-bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence of witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Sonali/- U T