Shankar Panjiyara v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21265 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2021 Thana- CHANDAN District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

SHANKAR PANJIYARA SON OF LATE FAKO PANJIYARA Resident of Village - Shekhpura, P.S.- Chandan, Distt.- Banka. 2.

Surendra Panjiyara Son of Late Fako Panjiyara Resident of Village - Shekhpura, P.S.- Chandan, Distt.- Banka.

3.

Sohit Kumar @ Sohit Panjiyara Son of Surendra Panjiyara Resident of Village - Shekhpura, P.S.- Chandan, Distt.- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 452, 324, 307, 354, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 11.08.2021, the accused persons, including the petitioners, broke into her house and assaulted her with axe and spade causing injury and also tried to outrage her modesty, it is next alleged that when Ravindra, Pintu and Kaushalya Devi

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21265 of 2022(2) dt.02-11-2022 2/3 came to rescue her, they too were assaulted by the accused persons.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that petitioners and the informant are neighbours and on account of dispute relating to drainage water the present occurrence took place, in which from the side of the petitioners also some persons suffered injury, it is next submitted that the injuries suffered by the injured from the side of the informant are simple in nature which amply demonstrates that on a trivial issue the occurrence took place and the petitioners had no intention of committing a serious offence.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chandan

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21265 of 2022(2) dt.02-11-2022 3/3 P.S. Case No. 128 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T