Lalu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20003 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2019 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== LALU KUMAR, Son of Madan Kumar, R/O Vill.- Khabhra, P.S.- Koanch, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-06-2020 This case has been heard through video-conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within two weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 394, 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case in brief is that on 19.10.2019 at about 5.00 am, informant was carrying vegetable in his Tempo and was returning from Kedarnath Market and in the meantime three persons came from motorcycle and stopped his Tempo and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20003 of 2020(2) dt.30-06-2020 2/2 started assaulting him with fist and slaps and also took away his Tempo.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and is in custody since 10.12.2019. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused namely Anu Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and there is no injury has been found on the body of informant, except allegation. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail petition.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Tekari (Panchananpur) P.S. Case No. 380 of 2019 to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-6th, Gaya.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U