Jahid Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64406 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Jahid Hussain, Son of Md. Monowar Ali, Resident of Village- Nasirganj, P.S.- Nagar, District- Ara Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mohammed Abu Haider, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shashtri , A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The Petitioner seek regular bail in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No. 476 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 417, 418, 420, 465 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is that some persons including the petitioner were committing corrupt practice in preparing the articles, which is used in the practical examination of the ITI.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to personal grudge and the petitioner has been made accused on the confessional statement of co-accused. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is simply owner and helper of Gas cutter Center and he has no concern with the examination and he

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64406 of 2018 (2) dt.26-10-2018 2/2 is in custody since 28.07.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No. 476 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T