← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24525/2024dismissed

Lalu Sahni @ Chhote Sarkar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-09Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24525 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-513 Year-2019 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== LALU SAHNI @ CHHOTE SARKAR S/O SANICHAR SAHNI R/O VILLAGE- NAKHAS CHOWK, P.S- HAJIPUR TOWN, DISTT.- VAISHALI.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.513 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable u/s 399, 402, 414/34 of the IPC and Sections 25(1-b) a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3.

As per the prosecution case, the informant came to know that some some miscreants were planning to commit loot in Butan Das Ghat, when he and other police personnel reached there, the accused persons began to flee away. The police team apprehended six persons and live cartridges, country made pistol recovered from their possession. They disclosed the name of the petitioner as their associate.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24525 of 2024(5) dt.09-08-2024 2/2 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern with the other co-accused persons. The petitioner has 16 criminal antecedent and has been rotting in judicial custody since 18.04.2020. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and the criminal history of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. The prayer for grant of bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

However, learned Court below is directed to frame charges against the petitioner within four weeks from today. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T