Ghurahu Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21220 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2022 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== GHURAHU BIND S/O KHAR BIND Resident of Village- Basawanpur, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 147, 148, 149, 307, 354(B), 504 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that the petitioner assaulted her by gadasa causing injury on her head.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 20 years, it is next submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the present FIR arises from a complaint

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 21220 of 2023(2) dt.27-06-2023 2/3 which was instituted by the informant as complainant five days after the occurrence, it is next submitted that the uncle of the petitioner had instituted a Complaint Case on 21.09.2021 alleging that the side of the informant assaulted them, it is further submitted that when the aforesaid complaint was instituted, the present false Complaint Case came to be instituted by the Complainant based on which the present FIR came to be instituted, it is next submitted that had the informant been assaulted in the manner as alleged then an FIR would have instituted instantly and the injured would have been medically examined but since a complaint came to be instituted and that too five days after the occurrence that cast an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that petitioner is a young boy aged about 20 years and if he is sent to judicial custody he may come in contact with hardened criminals and his entire career will get jeopardized.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 21220 of 2023(2) dt.27-06-2023 3/3 event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 174 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T