Md. Mahtab @ Mahtab @ Md. Mahtab Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19928 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-550 Year-2025 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== Md. Mahtab @ Mahtab @ Md. Mahtab Ansari Son of Noor Mohammad R/o Village - Nimarang, Ward no. 27, P.S. and Dist. - Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP For the Informant :

Ms. Ankita Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have assaulted on the head of informant with sword.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of petty dispute, a simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. As per injury

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19928 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 report, the injury alleged caused by this petitioner is simple in nature. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 550 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T