Ram Vinay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31335 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2016 Thana- PIPRAHI District- Sheohar ====================================================== Ram Vinay Singh S/O Late Kailash Prasad Singh R/o village- Khairwa Darp, P.S.- Sheohar, District- Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-02-2022 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case no. 33 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 420 and 188/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, informant who is Block Education Officer, Piprahi, has given an application before the S.H.O. of Piprahi alleging therein petitioner and other Panchayat Secretaries have not complied the order of this Hon'ble Court as they have not provided the record of appointed teacher since 2006 to till date.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31335 of 2021(2) dt.17-02-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no direct allegation against the petitioner except compliance of the order of higher authorities. Petitioner is an old man aged about 67 years. He has got no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case no. 33 of 2016, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Sheohar subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U