Bablu Prasad Yadav @ Bablu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51576 of 2016 (3) dt.15-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51576 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2015 Thana -SANGRAMPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Bablu Prasad Yadav @ Bablu Yadav, son of Saudagar Yadav, resident of Village- Tetaria, P.S.- Kharagpur (Gangata More O.P.), District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shama Sinha For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03/ 15.02.2017 Supplementary affidavit is filed on behalf of the petitioner bringing this fact on record that pairvikar of the petitioner was not aware about criminal antecedent of the petitioner and that was the reason antecedent of the petitioner could not be mentioned at para 3 of the petition.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent except the present case as well as Khargpur P.S. case no. 168/2014 registered for the offences punishable under sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 323 and 504 of the IPC. It is further submitted that earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this court on 16.3.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 11409/2016 at infancy stage of the case. Moreover, case of the petitioner has already been committed to the court of sessions and it is
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51576 of 2016 (3) dt.15-02-2017 further submitted that the petitioner is in jail custody since 2.11.2015 and the case diary goes to show that I.O submitted charge sheet without taking final opinion regarding nature of the injury of the informant.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Munger in Sangrampur P.S. Case no. 26/2015.
shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T