Rajnish Kumar v. That State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5084 of 2026 ====================================================== Rajnish Kumar Son of Anil Choudhary, Resident of village - Karmaini, P.S. - Rohtas, District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Excise Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, District - Saran at Chapra. 5.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, District - Patna. 6.

The Superintendent of Police, District- Saran at Chapra. 7.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District- Saran at Chapra. 8.

The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms, Marhaura, District- Saran at Chapra.

9.

The S.H.O., P.S.- Bheldi, District - Saran at Chapra. 10.

The Investigating officer (I.O.), P.S. - Bheldi, District - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Dr. Md. Raisul Haque, SC-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 14-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned SC-10 for the State.

2. The record of the confiscation proceeding has been produced by learned SC-10 for the State.

3. We have noticed that the petitioner had appeared before the Confiscating Authority and prayed for an adjournment. Thus, he cannot be allowed to contend that he had

Patna High Court CWJC No.5084 of 2026(3) dt.14-05-2026 2/2 no knowledge of the confiscation proceeding.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to prefer statutory appeal against the impugned order.

5. Learned SC-10 for the State has no objection to the same.

6. In the circumstances, we permit learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the writ application. The petitioner is at liberty to seek his remedy available to him under the statute in accordance with law.

7. This writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) (Soni Shrivastava, J) lekhi/- U