Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63040/2018bail granted

Vicky Kumar @ Vikash v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63040 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63040 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -365 Year- 2018 Thana -GARDANIBAG District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Vicky Kumar @ Vikash, Son of Sri Shinod Sao @ Sinod Sao Resident of Mohalla-Chitkohra Bazar, Sabjimandi, P.S.-Gardanibagh, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 365 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985.

Allegation is of recovery of two grams of ganja and one Chillam.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 01.09.2018 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63040 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 365 of 2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T