Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66390/2018bail granted

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Raushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-11-05Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66390 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2018 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna ====================================================== Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Raushan Singh Son of Late Dharmendra Kumar Singh Resident of Mohalla-Bakerganj,Police Station Pirbahore,Distt.-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Special Case No. 71 of 2018 arising out of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 298 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under 27 of the NDPS Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of four small packets of Smack from the pocket.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 16.07.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Sessions

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66390 of 2018(2) dt.05-11-2018 2/2 Judge, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 71 of 2018 arising out of Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 298 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U