Dharmendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20895 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2021 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
DHARMENDRA RAM SON OF HARERAM RAM R/O VILLAGENAWADIH, P.O.- MEYARI BAZAR, P.S.- NOKHA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS, SASARAM 2.
JITENDRA RAM SON OF HARERAM RAM R/O VILLAGE- NAWADIH, P.O.- MEYARI BAZAR, P.S.- NOKHA, DISTRICT- ROHTAS, SASARAM ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 504 and 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and coaccused persons armed with lathi, danda and rod attacked the informant and the petitioner Dharmendra Ram and co-accused person Jageshwar assaulted with rod on the head, eye and nose of the informant's son, causing injuries. When the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20895 of 2022(2) dt.02-08-2022 2/2 came to rescue, then he was also assaulted by Anil Ram with iron rod causing injury. The co-accused also snatched golden chain worth Rs. 35,000, mobile and cash of Rs. 10,000. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted that injury on the neck is grievous in nature. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 09.01.2022.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on them furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1st Class, Sasaram, Rohtas, in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 246 of 2021. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T