← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5078/2024dismissed

Ramjee Singh, Advocate v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-27Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5078 of 2024 ====================================================== Ramjee Singh, Advocate son of Late Ramashish Singh, Patna Civil Court and High Court, Civil Court, Patna-800004.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector, Patna.

3.

The Circle Officer, Mukul Kumar Jha, Sampatchak Circle Office, Pin Code No. 800007, District-Patna.

4.

Anchal Amin, Shailendra Kumar, Sampatchak Circle Office, Pin Code No. 800007, District-Patna.

5.

Station House Officer cum Inspector Parsa Bazar Police Station Sanjay Kumar, Pin Code No. 8004453, District-Patna.

6.

Sub-Inspector of Police Parsa Bazar Police Station Kamta Ram, Pin Code No. 8004453, District-Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Prasad For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel (16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 27-06-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1(i). For issuance of a direction to the respondent authority for payment of compensation amount of Rs. 50 lakh (approximate) against the respondent officer who abused their power in discriminatory way to the detriment of the rights of citizen.

(ii). For issuance of a direction to the respondent authority that the amount of compensation may be paid to the petitioner within stipulated period

Patna High Court CWJC No.5078 of 2024(2) dt.27-06-2024 2/2 so that the petitioner is suffering irreparable loss and injury which is protection of life and dignity. (iii). For issuance of a direction to initiate disciplinary action against the responsible authorities as the court may deem fit and proper." 2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U