Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27607/2024dismissed

Dilkhush Kumar @ Dilkhush v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-20Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27607 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2023 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Dilkhush Kumar @ Dilkhush SON OF Ganesh Sah RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KISHANPUR, PS- BATHANAHA DIST- SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr.Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-07-2024 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The following order was passed on 24.05.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 29050 of 2023:- "Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 21 of 2023 registered for the offences under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2023. The prosecution story in short is that informant's son did not return home and his mobile was also switched off. In the meanwhile informant received an audio clip having chat between Md. Afroz, Md. Ahmad Ansari, Dilkhush (present petitioner), Hari Kishore Chaudhary along with three or four other unknown persons in which they were talking about some betrayal and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27607 of 2024(3) dt.20-07-2024 2/2 threatening to kill. Lastly, the accused persons abducted informant's son. The informant did not know whether his son is alive or not.

The deceased was abducted and killed by the accused persons and the mobile of the deceased was recovered from the pocket of the petitioner.

In the aforesaid fact, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial."

3. No ground for review is made out. It is accordingly dismissed.

4. Trial is directed to be expedited.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T