Md. Amirullah @ Amirullah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31302 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1222 Year-2013 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== MD. AMIRULLAH @ AMIRULLAH S/o Abdul Hai Resident of VillageMehsaul, P.S.- Dumra, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Nasrin Khatoon W/o Ahmadullah Quraishi, D/o- Rahman Quraishi Resident of Village- Kathela, P.S.- Bisfi, District- Madhubani. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-02-2022 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case no. C-1/1222/13 instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 379, 498(A) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31302 of 2021(2) dt.16-02-2022 2/3 As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with his family members has tortured in various ways due to nonfulfillment of dowry demand and finally he ousted her after snatching her belongings.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is brother-in-law of the informant and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has never demanded any thing from the informant. He has no concern with the daily activity of the informant and is living separately. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband of the informant and not against the family members. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1/1222/13, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM 1st, Benipatti, Madhubani subject

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31302 of 2021(2) dt.16-02-2022 3/3 to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U