Dhrup Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27486 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2023 Thana- JADOPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Dhrup Yadav Son of Kashi Yadav @Kashi Chaudhari R/V- Purabwari Patti, PS- Jadopur Dist- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sushil Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 06-06-2023 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jadopur P.S. Case No. 10 of 2023 lodged under Section 392 of the I.P.C.

As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against 2 named accused persons including the present petitioner. The allegation of robbery is against the petitioner and another accused person.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2023 having clean antecedent. Counsel submits that his name has been disclosed by co-accused in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27486 of 2023(2) dt.06-06-2023 2/2 Counsel for petitioner specifically submits that during investigation on the disclosure of the petitioner, the recovery of motorcycle has been made. Counsel also submits that the case is magisterial triable in nature.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the allegation of robbery is against the petitioner along with other accused persons. The recovery of motorcycle has also been made on the confessional statement of the petitioner.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

Liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge and thereafter, the trial Court is directed to release him on bail imposing its own conditions so that he may not evade his appearance during trial.

With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) prakashmani/- U T