Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64460/2018bail granted

Bonu Sada @ Baunu Sada v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-31Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64460 of 2018 (2) dt.31-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64460 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Bonu Sada @ Baunu Sada, Son of Late Sitaram Sada, Resident of Village- Kushmahaut, P.S.- Neema Chanpura, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-10-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 17.01.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44681 of 2016 with observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that now charge has been framed in this case and petitioner has been in judicial custody for about three years and there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future. Further no specific allegation has been attributed to the petitoner. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64460 of 2018 (2) dt.31-10-2018 Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Begusarai, in connection with Neema Chanpura P.S. Case No. 71 of 2015, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T