Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41622/2016bail granted

Dharambir Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-17Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41622 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -263 Year- 2016 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Dharambir Sharma Son of Sri Awadhesh Sharma, Resident of villageBharra, P.S.- Muffasil, Begusarai, District- Begusarai .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Akhileshwar Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2016 in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 263 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the E.C. Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as there is no material to support the accusation of black marketing of rice. The petitioner is not the owner of the rice mill and it is submitted that the ingredients of the offence as alleged are not made out against him. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 263 of 2016 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41622 of 2016 (2) dt.17-10-2016 2/2 (ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T