← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31901/2021bail granted

Manju Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-24Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31901 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2018 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== MANJU DEVI W/o Ram Naresh Thakur R/o village- Motipur Bara, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Kishor Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-03-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 363, 366(A), 379 of the IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act registered in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No.278 of 2018.

The informant Dhuran Yadav levelled allegation that six FIR named accused persons including the present petitioner kidnapped the minor daughter of informant from his house and the accused persons also took away Rs.10,000/- cash and golden ornaments.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31901 of 2021(2) dt.24-03-2022 2/3 the present case has falsely been lodged. He has submitted that the informant has stated that the victim was kidnapped along with cash and ornaments from the house of the informant whereas the victim in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has stated that she was kidnapped from the field where she went to answer the call of nature. There is a material contradiction between FIR and the statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner was not sent up for trial and final form was submitted against her, but the court below has taken cognizance.

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within three weeks from the date of communication of this order be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, VIIth-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bairiya P.S. Case No.278 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Office shall ensure that all the defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31901 of 2021(2) dt.24-03-2022 3/3 notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T