Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64437/2018bail granted

Raj Kumar @ Raja Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64437 of 2018 ======================================================

1. RAJ KUMAR @ RAJA YADAV @ RAJ KUMAR YADAV, S/o Late Prayag Yadav, Resident of Jangal Tola, P.S.- Mohanpur OP, DistrictPurania. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sushil Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-10-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 29.05.2018 in connection with Tikapatti P.S. Case No. 37 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 379, 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per F.I.R. is of snatching of motorcycle. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of coaccused Santosh Das and he has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 24.08.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39113 of 2017. Further submission is that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody for about 5 months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64437 of 2018 (2) dt.29-10-2018 2/2 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Purnia, in connection with Tikapatti P.S. Case No. 37 of 2017, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T