Ramadhar Bind v. State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.522 of 2003 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 1987 Thana -null District- BHOJPUR =========================================================== Ramadhar Bind son of Nasing Bind, resident of village Gothaula, Police Station Ara Muffasil in the district of Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Brij Bihari Yadav son of Sarbjeet Ahir
3. Chandra Shekhar Yadav son of Ahyawan Yadav
4. Sarju Yadav
5. Shambhu Yadav, both sons of Saryug Ahir
6. Ram Pravesh Yadav son of Chhabila Yadav
7. Pahari Yadav son of Chanu Ahir
8. Ram Kumar Yadav son of Amirchand Ahir
9. Bijay Kumar Yadav son of Sarbjeet Ahir
10. Laham Yadav son of Jatan Ahir
11. Chandrika Yadav son of Laharan Ahir
12. Sheoji Yadav son of Ayodhya Yadav
13. Satya Narayan Yadav son of Basudeo Ahir
14. Sri Bhagwan Yadav son of Ayodhya Ahir
15. Kedar Yadav son of Radha Ahir
16. Nand Kishore Yadav son of Saguna Yadav
17. Suresh Yadav son of Sukhram Ahir
18. Dudhnath Yadav son of Basudeo Ahir
19. Jageshwar Yadav son of Chandrajit Yadav
20. Madan Yadav son of Ratan Yadav
21. Bihari Yadav son of Indrapati Yadav
22. Jamuna Singh son of Raja Ahir
23. Shankar Yadav son of Chandra Yadav
24. Sheo Bachan Yadav son of Nandu Yadav
25. Ramayan Yadav son of Mithailal Ahir
26. Ram Bichar Yadav son of Gyan Chand Yadav
27. Saryug Singh son of Shivadas Singh (D.F.D. vide order dated 17.2.2005) .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Kishore Singh-2, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-06-2015 The Petitioner seeks revision of the judgment dated 28.6.2003 passed by the Presiding Officer, F.T.C. 1st, Ara, Bhojpur in Sessions
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.522 of 2003 dt.22-06-2015 Trial No.59 of 1987, by which he has acquitted the private Opposite Parties.
Having gone through the judgment of acquittal, I find no perversity in the same.
Hence, the application is dismissed.
(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T