Mannu @ Mannu Kumar @ Abhimanyu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18387 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== MANNU @ MANNU KUMAR @ ABHIMANYU KUMAR Son of Arjun Rai @ Arjun Ram Resident of Village - Tufanganj, P.S.- Rahui, District - Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-06-2020 The present petition has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing lock-down on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Md. Aslam Ansari, the learned APP appearing for the State. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 272 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation is regarding unknown accused persons having stolen a sum of Rs. 11,54,109/- by committing theft in the midnight of 3.9.2019 at the Bakhri Branch of Midland
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18387 of 2020(2) dt.05-06-2020 2/2 Macrofin Ltd. Company.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is languishing in custody since 20.11.2019. It is further submitted that no recovery has been made from the petitioner herein as far as the looted cash amount is concerned. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner herein, apart from the fact that no looted cash amount has been recovered from the petitioner herein, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.
Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusrai in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 272 of 2019. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U T