Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21719/2025bail granted

Jitesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-23Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21719 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-697 Year-2024 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== Jitesh Kumar Son of Raju Ram Resident of Village - Vishmbhar Tola, Kandap, P.S. - Gaurichak, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akash Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 697 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 352, 61(2)(a), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons abused and fired upon the informant due to which he died at the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21719 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. Specific allegation of firing is attributed against co-accused, namely, Rahul Kumar. It is further submitted that the petitioner was only a member of the mob and no overt act is alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 697 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T