Sunil Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19911 of 2014 ===========================================================
1. Sunil Kumar S/o Yadunandan Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Kazipur Naya Tola, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna
2. Smt. Pushpa Devi, W/o Sri Ram Pravesh Kumar, Resident of Mohalla- B.M. Das Road, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna
3. Satrughan Kasyap, S/O Sri Satish Chandra Sharma, Resident of Mohalla- B.M. Das Road, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The District Magistrate, Patna
4. The City Superintendent of Police, Patna
5. The Station House Officer, Pirbahore P.S., Patna
6. The Municipal Commissioner, Maurya Lok, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna
7. The Vigilance Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna
8. The Executive Engineer, Bankipore Circle, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.N. Singh, Advocate Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Namrata Mishra, G.A.-13 For the P.M.C. : Mr. Sanjay Prakash Verma, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) Date: 11-01-2016 In view of the fact that the Municipal Building TribunalII, Patna, has directed to maintain status quo by order, dated 10.09.2015, passed in Appeal No. 3/South/2015, preferred against the order, dated 15.02.2014, passed in Vigilance Case No. 61/A/13, Patna
Patna High Court CWJC No.19911 of 2014 dt.11-01-2016 2/2 Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna, no relief, as sought for in this application and in the stay application, can be granted.
This application stands disposed of accordingly with a liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to appropriate provisions of law before appropriate forum, as they may be advised. (I. A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Vats/- U