← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22035/2022allowed

Munna Kumar @ Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-28Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22035 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2020 Thana- BARURAJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

MUNNA KUMAR @ AJEET KUMAR Son of Parmanand Bhagat Resident of Village - Khetari Mahananad Gosaipur, P.s.- Baruraj, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Kunadan Kumar Son of Parmanand Bhagat Resident of Village - Khetari Mahananad Gosaipur, P.s.- Baruraj, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. 3.

Vijay Kumar Son of Rameshwar Bhagat Resident of Village - Khetari Mahananad Gosaipur, P.s.- Baruraj, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. 4.

Virendra Bhagat Son of Ramlochan Bhagat Resident of Village - Khetari Mahananad Gosaipur, P.s.- Baruraj, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan No.II, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379, 435 and 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, it is a case of assault upon the informant and other persons including his nephew as well as snatch of Rs. 40,000/-.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22035 of 2022(2) dt.28-09-2022 2/2 further submits that main allegation of assault is against coaccused Ranjit Kumar of inflicting injury to Ravi Kumar. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and no specific overt-act is against these petitioners. There is case and counter case between the parties and both parties have sustained injuries, as alleged, in separate occurrence. Petitioners have clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Mahendra Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Muzaffarpur (West) in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 90 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T