Jai Shankar Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.10223 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -479 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== Jai Shankar Kumar, Son of Late Naresh Kumar, Resident of VillageAuliyabad, Police Station- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Director General, Vigilance Investigation Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Amrendra Kumar For the Vigilance :
Mr.Santosh Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-03-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S.Case No.479 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against the him is that in spite of direction, he did not hand over charge as Panchayat Secretary. Now the petitioner has handed over the charge, which will appear from Anneuxre-2. Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the Vigilance.
Having heard both sides and in view of submission as
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10223 of 2017 (2) dt.20-03-2017 2/2 above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S.Case No.479 of dated 14.09.2016 corresponding to G.R.No.3193 of 2016, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available before the Vigilance Department as and when required by the them.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U