Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4864/2017dismissed

Dinesh Kumar Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-04-11Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4864 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHODARA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Dinesh Kumar Ram, S/o Nandlal Ram @ Srikishun Ram, Resident of Village- Tejpur, P.S.- Lauria, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Saroj Devi, D/o Ambaresh Ram, Resident of Village- Sahodara Dewadh, P.S.- Sahodara, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shankar Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sahodara P.S. Case No. 26 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A, 406, 504, 506/34, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as a matter of fact, petitioner has solemnized his marriage with the abducted girl and in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she has stated that informant and other family members are not happy with the marriage and, as such, present case has been lodged against the petitioner.

Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4864 of 2017 (4) dt.11-04-2017 2/2 Earlier notice was issued to opposite party No.2 but notice was received by her mother and further it appears from perusal of the record that a case has been lodged under Section 498A and other sections of the IPC and further it appears that petitioner has married the sister of opposite party No.2 and whole occurrence took place due to the aforesaid fact. Considering the above fact, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Rather petitioner should surrender and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order. This application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U