Sk. Zahir @ Md. Zahir v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64081 of 2018 (2) dt.02-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.64081 of 2018 ====================================================== Sk. Zahir @ Md. Zahir Son of Sk. Farzan, Resident of Village-Lal Saraiya Ward no. 01 Maula Nagar, Police Station-Majhaulia, District-West Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 223/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 506 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against this petitioner is that he assaulted the informant with Farsa on his head.
It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no injury of Farsa blow on the person of the informant. Injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. There is case and counter case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64081 of 2018 (2) dt.02-11-2018 since 14.08.2018.
Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 223/2018, subject to the conditions:
(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T