Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45859 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2013 Thana -MAHESI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Kumar son of Harichandra Sah resident of village - Katahan, P.S. - Mehsi, Dist - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.48727 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2013 Thana -MAHESI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Pankaj Singh Son of Kamata Pd. Singh resident of village - Kaswa Mehsi Chowk Bazar, P.S. Mehsi, Distt. - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.45859 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Sufiyan(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.48727 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Mehsi P.S. Case no. 100/13, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45859 of 2014 (5) dt.22-06-2015 2/2 The petitioners are not named in the FIR. During the course of investigation the witnesses have stated that the petitioners were seen with Rajesh Yadav. One Kailash Kumar was apprehended and he confessed his guilt disclosing the name of the petitioners along with others. Other accused persons namely, Deepak Kumar and Umesh Rai have been granted regular bail. Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

However, the petitioners, if so advised, may surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and pray for regular bail and his prayer shall be considered and disposed of taking into consideration that similarly situated co-accused have been granted bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) Rakhi/- U T