← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4771/2023withdrawn

Anita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-26Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4771 of 2023 ====================================================== Anita Kumari D/o Dikandar Yadav, Wife of Umesh Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village- Gora, P.O.- Pidra, P.S.- Chandan, District- Banka at present-Resident of Village- Hiraraydih, P.S.- Chandan, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department Govt. Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department Govt. Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, I.C.D.S. (Social Welfare Department) Govt. Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Commissioner, Bhagalpur Division, District- Bhagalpur. 5.

The District Magistrate, Banka, Dist.- Banka. 6.

The District Programme Officer, ICDS, Banka, Dist.- Banka. 7.

The Child Development Project Officer, Chandan, District- Banka. 8.

Smt Beby Kumari W/o Pankaj Kumar, Resident of Village- Hiraraydih, P.S.- Chandan, District- Banka.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv For the State :

Mr.Ajit Kumar Jha, AC to GP 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 26-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Petitioner alleges that the process for selection of Aanganwadi Sevika to Centre No. 154 was not in accordance with the guidelines.

3. It is not in dispute that the Directorate of Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) has issued guidelines for selection of Aanganwadi Sevika/Sahayika wherein the remedy of appeal/revision has been provided .

Patna High Court CWJC No.4771 of 2023(2) dt.26-09-2023 2/2

3. This Court is of the opinion that in view of such adequate efficacious remedy wherein all disputed issues being raised in the instant proceedings can be considered by the authorities, there is no occasion for this court to exercise its extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

4. The petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedy in accordance with the guidelines.

5. Writ application is dismissed with liberty. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) uttam/- U