Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20869 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2026 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Satish Kumar S/O Suvendar Ram R/O Village- Nathuni Bigha, P.S- Mufassil, Distt.- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mrs. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 109(1), 324(5), 132, 121(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, lodged on 09.01.2026 by the informant, Abhishek Kumar.
3. As per the prosecution story, the Police on secret information about the liquor reached the place where it is alleged that some of them came outside in inebriated state and Surendra Ram resorted to assault which injured Ajit Anand one of the constable. As they tried to retreat on the direction of the accused persons, the villagers resorted to stone pelting. This led to the F.I.R.
2/4
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that neither he is assigned with Surendra Ram nor was in any way involved in the stone pelting. He being a passer by has been roped. Last submission is that without accepting the allegation or outcome of the petition the petitioner intends to pay Rs.2,000/- by Demand Draft issued by the local branch of the State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund to be submitted at the time of execution of bail bond.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that his name has also come in the F.I.R..
6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also that the main role has been assigned to Surendra Ram and others, omnibus allegation of stone pelting is on this petitioner, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail subject to payment of Rs.2,000/- by Demand Draft issued by the local branch of State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund to be submitted at the time of execution of bail bond.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
3/4 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judgecum-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Court No.1, Aurangabad, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026 subject to the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the Police Station as and when required for cooperating in the investigation;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for next six months to mark his attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds; (v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or
4/4 promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T