← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20747/2022bail granted

Anita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-01Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20747 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-335 Year-2021 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== ANITA KUMARI D/o Rajendra Prasad Singh Present Primary School, Paswan Tola, Ahilwar, P.S. - Biraul, District - Darbhanga, Permanent resident of Village - Kasha, P.S. - Madhepur, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE INVESTIGATION BUREAU, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Masoom Alam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman aged about 53 years.

The informant alleges that petitioner secured appointment as Panchayat Teacher based on forged and fabricated matriculation mark sheet and certificate.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20747 of 2022(2) dt.01-11-2022 2/2 has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the entire inquiry was conducted behind the back of the petitioner. It is next submitted that no opportunity was given to the petitioner to explain her case. It is also submitted that had an opportunity been given to the petitioner to explain her side of the case then perhaps the present FIR would not have been instituted. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No. 335 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T