Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23777/2025bail granted

Rajendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-05Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23777 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- Jagdishpur District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rajendra Paswan S/o Late Narayan Paswan R/o Village- Kathaiya, Dhaganr Toli, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2025 Heard Mr. Sujeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 15.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

3. Recovery is of 15 liters of country made liquor.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Although, the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but from perusal of the seizure list it appears that the seizure list was prepared on 15.02.2025 at 15:50 O'Clock

2/4 and the present F.I.R. was instituted on 15.02.2025 at 17:45 O'Clock which suggests that the seizure list was prepared before filing of the present F.I.R. and also suggests that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is non-compliance with mandatory procedure prescribed for recovery under Section 100 of Cr. P.C./ Section 103 of BNSS, 2023 No case, whatsoever, would be made out against the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner referring the provision contained in Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and submitted that the prearrest bail would not be maintainable.

6. This court is aware of the decision of the Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.LJ.R. 1089. Having regard to the law laid down in the aforesaid judgment and the submission advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court, for the limited purpose of grant of anticipatory bail, is inclined to accept the submission of counsel for the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and nothing has been

3/4 recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner as well as seizure list suggests that the seizure list was prepared before the filing of the present F.I.R., let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order. be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-1, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Jagdishpur PS. Case No. 35 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

4/4 any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U