Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62839/2018bail granted

Harendra Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-12Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62839 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2016 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ======================================================

1. Harendra Rai Son of Late Ram Bilas Rai.

2. Sindhu Devi, W/o Harendra Rai

3. Tuntun Kumar, Son of Harendra Rai All Residenty of VillageBabhantoli, Police Station-Goraul, Distt.-Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners seeks bail in Goraul P.S. Case No. 275 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of torturing the Informant for non fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are living separately and are not concerned with the affairs of their son and his family. Petitioners are Father-in-Law, Mother-in-Law and Brother-in-Law of the deceased. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and are in custody since 04.07.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62839 of 2018(2) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioners named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate-Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 275 of 2016, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel their bail bonds.

(3) If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U